Changing Brains is an evolving project of the NISE Network to empower public and professional audiences to experience, talk about, and reflect on personal, community, and societal connections to advancing brain research and related technologies. An early strategic planning conference for the project with NISE Network partners, scientists, funders, and advocacy groups pointed towards a possible vision of sharing the dynamic nature of the brain with public audiences through more two-way interactions between brain experts and museum visitors.
Working closely with the International Brain Initiative and the Kavli Foundation, project leaders explored this strategy through a global landscaping report of brain science public engagement efforts through the lens of neuroethics— systematic, ethical reflection and analysis of both individual and societal issues raised by brain research and emerging technologies. The ongoing relationship with the Neuroethics Working Group of the International Brain Initiative has led to new NISE Network engagement activities to encourage professional audiences to consider the need and nature of public engagement within their own brain research program and the ongoing work of the growing number of international brain research projects.
The links below list the available reports and resources of the Changing Brain project. Check back for more updates as this project continues to grow!
Changing Brains reports from the NISE Network
A Global Landscape of Neuroscience Public Engagement Efforts and the Potential Nexus of Neuroethics
Throughout 2019 the NISE Network, in partnership with The Kavli Foundation and the Neuroethics Working Group of the International Brain Initiative, conducted a series of interviews with neuroscientists, neuroethicists, patient advocates, and educators to characterize the landscape of neuroscience public engagement efforts around the world with possible connections to fundamental questions in neuroethics. This report summarizes the findings from these interviews by describing five different categories of engagement styles in this area, reflecting on the lessons learned from previous interactions between experts and public audiences on other socio-scientific questions, and presenting several cross-cutting challenges and opportunities.
Public Engagement with Neuroscience and Society: Conference Report and Vision for a National Informal Neuroscience Education Initiative
In January 2018 the NISE Network, in partnership with The Kavli Foundation, held a two-day strategic planning conference at The Franklin Institute to conceptualize a national informal science education initiative around brain science. Working with the Society for Neuroscience and other key stakeholders, the conference brought together a diverse group of museum professionals, scientists, social scientists, and other experts in informal science and neuroscience education to assess emerging issues in the field and identify needs and opportunities for outreach and engagement. The report provides an overview of key themes that emerged from the conference and outlines a collective vision to grow public engagement efforts for brain research and technologies. A full conference agenda and a list of participants are also included in the report.
Changing Brains engagement activities for professional audiences developed by the NISE Network
Step into the Shoes of Stakeholders training guide and materials
This is a role-playing exercise for professional audiences that encourages participants to consider how they and other potential stakeholders would prioritize public engagement efforts on emerging brain research & technology topics.
Stand Up Sit Down icebreaker
Do you want an activity to energize your professional audience on thought provoking topics around now & near-future brain research and technologies? Use this quick icebreaker where participants vote with their feet and seats by standing up, or sitting down, to show their agreement with potential scenarios.
This training activity was based on work supported by The Kavli Foundation. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this program are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the Foundation.